[getdns-api] Remove IDNA functions from getdns?

Andrew Sullivan asullivan at dyn.com
Thu Sep 3 20:34:54 CEST 2015


On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:22:36PM +0200, Willem Toorop wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to offer IDNA in a more getdns way?  For
> example through an extension, which will process query names ulabel to
> alabel and return processed dname's converted from alabels to ulabels in
> the response dict?

I think the idea was that an application can often need the U-label of
an A-label or conversely, but nobody could think of anything else an
application would need.

Is there anything else?  

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
Dyn
asullivan at dyn.com


More information about the spec mailing list